Intensive urate-lowering with pegloticase plus methotrexate co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without chronic kidney disease: A retrospective case series.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and gout commonly co-occur. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) in uncontrolled gout patients but antidrug antibodies limit urate-lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) co-administration increases pegloticase response rate and mitigates IR risk but CKD limits MTX use. This pooled case series examined pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without CKD. Cases of pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in existing datasets were retrospectively examined. Baseline eGFR classified patients as CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or non-CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Patient characteristics, treatment parameters, laboratory values, urate-lowering response rate (≥12 pegloticase infusions received and SU < 6 mg/dL just before infusion 12), and AEs were examined. Fifteen CKD (eGFR: 43.2 ±â€…11.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 8.6 ±â€…2.2 mg/dL), 27 non-CKD (eGFR: 82.9 ±â€…19.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 9.5 ±â€…1.7 mg/dL) patients were included. Comorbidity profiles were similar, but CKD patients were older (72.0 ±â€…9.9 vs 52.3 ±â€…14.3 years) and more often female (33.3% vs 7.4%). Treatment parameters were similar with 4-week MTX Run-in followed by mean of 14.7 ±â€…8.1 [CKD] vs 14.1 ±â€…7.1 [non-CKD] pegloticase infusions. However, CKD patients had lower MTX dose (14.8 ±â€…5.8 vs 19.3 ±â€…4.9 mg/week). Urate-lowering response was similar (92% vs 86%). eGFR increased during treatment in 60% of CKD (+11.5 ±â€…20.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, 87% stable/improved CKD-stage) and 44% of non-CKD (+4.2 ±â€…15.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) patients. AEs were similar (≥1 AE CKD: 53%, non-CKD: 67%; gout flare most-reported). One case each of pancytopenia and IR (mild) occurred in non-CKD patients. These real-world data show similar pegloticase + MTX efficacy in CKD and non-CKD patients. No new safety signals were identified, with most CKD patients showing renal function stability or improvement during therapy.

Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Through Six Months of Guselkumab Treatment in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Real-World Data From the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate patient-reported outcomes after 6 months of on-label guselkumab use in patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the CorEvitas PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry. METHODS: This analysis includes registry participants who initiated and persisted with on-label guselkumab (after US Food and Drug Administration approval for PsA; 100 mg at weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks) at their 6-month follow-up visit (On-Label Persisters). Among patients not meeting response criteria at baseline, responses at 6 months were determined for patient-reported outcomes, including patient-reported pain (0-100 mm visual analog scale), patient global assessment of arthritis + psoriasis (PtGA; 0-100 visual analog scale), and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; 0-3). Unadjusted, nominal P values were calculated via single-proportion, one-sided test (H0 = 0%; α = 0.05). RESULTS: Of 90 On-Label Persisters, most had treatment-resistant PsA (92.2% and 73.3% previously received ≥1 and ≥2 biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, respectively), with mean (SD) baseline patient-reported pain, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores of 57.0 (24.6), 50.3 (24.4), and 0.9 (0.6), respectively. Among those with patient-reported pain and PtGA scores of at least 15 at baseline, 40.2% (33/82) and 46.8% (36/77), respectively, achieved at least 15-mm reductions at 6 months; among those with HAQ-DI scores of at least 0.35 and more than 0.5 at baseline, respectively, 30.4% (21/69) achieved improvements of at least 0.35 and 10.3% (6/58) achieved scores of 0.5 or lower at 6 months (all nominal P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pain and physical function are important contributors to health-related quality of life. In this real-world population of patients with treatment-resistant PsA and 6 months of persistent guselkumab treatment, clinically meaningful improvements in pain and physical function were achieved by approximately 40% and 30% of patients, respectively.

Six-Month Persistence and Multi-domain Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Adults with Psoriatic Arthritis: Real-World Data from the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to evaluate treatment persistence and clinical outcomes after 6 months of on-label guselkumab use in patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the CorEvitas PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry. METHODS: Participants with PsA who initiated and persisted with on-label guselkumab use post-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for active PsA (7/13/2020; subcutaneous 100 mg at weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks) at their 6-month follow-up visit (occurring through 3/31/2023) comprised the primary analysis population (On-Label Persisters). Hierarchical, multiplicity-controlled primary and secondary outcomes were mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline at 6 months in clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA; primary), Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of arthritis and psoriasis (visual analog scale [VAS] 0-100), patient-reported pain (VAS 0-100), and percent body surface area with psoriasis (%BSA). Paired t tests determined changes that were statistically significantly different from 0 (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Among 114 patients who initiated on-label guselkumab and had eligible baseline and 6-month visits, 90 (78.9%) had persistent use. Among these On-Label Persisters at baseline, mean duration of PsA symptoms = 13.6 years; mean cDAPSA, PGA, and patient-reported pain = 22.0, 42.3, and 57.0, respectively; 94.4% had a history of psoriasis (mean BSA 7.6%); and 18.9% and 73.3%, respectively, previously received 1 or ≥ 2 biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The mean change (improvement) in cDAPSA was - 5.4 (- 8.5, - 2.3; p < 0.001) at 6 months. Significant mean improvements in PGA (- 19.0 [- 24.2, - 13.8]), patient-reported pain (- 9.1 [- 14.4, - 3.8]), and %BSA (- 5.1 [- 7.6, - 2.7]) were also observed (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world PsA population, generally characterized by longstanding, treatment-resistant, active disease at baseline, persistent guselkumab use in nearly 80% of patients with on-label use was accompanied by significant improvements in joint and skin symptoms and patient-reported pain at 6 months. These registry data support results from randomized clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of guselkumab in improving PsA signs and symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02530268.

Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies are often prescribed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have inadequate responses to or are intolerant of methotrexate (MTX) and patients with poor prognostic indicators. This post hoc analysis evaluated effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab + MTX vs golimumab without MTX in RA patients. METHODS: AWARE, a real-world, prospective and pragmatic, Phase 4 study, compared effectiveness and safety of golimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. All treatment decisions were at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist. Effectiveness was evaluated by mean change in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12. Safety was monitored through approximately 1 year. RESULTS: Among 685 golimumab-treated patients, 420 (61%) received concomitant MTX during the study and 265 (39%) did not receive MTX after enrollment; 63% and 72%, respectively, discontinued the study. Relative to golimumab without MTX, golimumab + MTX patients had shorter mean disease duration (8.7 vs 10.0 years) and a lower proportion received prior biologics (60% vs 72%); mean ± standard deviation (SD) baseline CDAI scores were similar (30.8 ± 15.1 and 32.6 ± 15.4). Mean ± SD changes from baseline in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12, respectively, were similar with golimumab + MTX (- 10.2 ± 14.2 and - 10.8 ± 13.8) and golimumab without MTX (- 9.6 ± 12.9 and - 9.9 ± 13.1). The incidence of adverse events/100 patient-years (PY) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 155.6 (145.6, 166.1) for golimumab + MTX and 191.2 (176.2, 207.1) for golimumab without MTX; infections were the most common type. The incidence of infusion reactions/100PY (95% CI) was 2.1 (1.1, 3.6) for golimumab + MTX versus 5.1 (2.9, 8.3) for golimumab without MTX; none were considered serious. For golimumab + MTX versus golimumab without MTX, rates/100PY (95% CI) of serious infections, opportunistic infections, and malignancies were 2.6 (1.5, 4.3) versus 7.0 (4.4, 10.6), 0.9 (0.3, 2.0) versus 2.6 (1.1, 5.0), and 3.0 (1.7, 4.7) versus 1.0 (0.2, 2.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mean change in CDAI score in the  golimumab without MTX group was generally similar to that of the golimumab + MTX group through 1 year, regardless of prior biologic therapy. Adverse events were consistent with the known IV golimumab safety profile. These results provide real world evidential data that may assist healthcare providers and patients with RA in making informed treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02728934 05/04/2016.

Community Practice Experiences with a Variety of Immunomodulatory Agents Co-Administered with Pegloticase for the Treatment of Uncontrolled Gout.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with uncontrolled/refractory gout have heavy disease burden, but few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU), but anti-drug antibodies can limit treatment efficacy. Evidence supports immunomodulator-pegloticase co-administration to increase sustained urate-lowering rates, but published cases are limited. This study investigated experience with pegloticase-immunomodulation co-therapy at two community rheumatology practices. METHODS: Patients initiating pegloticase with immunomodulation in 2017 or later were included. Patient/treatment characteristics and proportion of responders (≥ 12 pegloticase infusions, SU < 6 mg/dl at infusion-12) were examined. Patients on therapy at data collection with < 12 infusions were excluded from response analyses. eGFR before and after therapy was examined. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (79% male, 62.4 ± 16.3 years) with uncontrolled gout (SU = 9.1 ± 2.0 mg/dl, 91% tophaceous) were included. Most-reported comorbidities were hypertension (76%), obesity (71%), osteoarthritis (68%), and CKD (47%). Pre-therapy eGFR was 65.4 ± 25.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (41% eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). All patients initiated immunomodulation before (5.3 ± 3.0 weeks, n = 32) or at (n = 2) first pegloticase infusion. Subcutaneous methotrexate (15.4 ± 4.9 mg/week, n = 20), oral methotrexate (15.3 ± 3.6 mg/week, n = 9), mycophenolate mofetil (1000 mg/day, n = 3), and azathioprine (100 mg/day, n = 2) were administered. Patients received 14.6 ± 7.1 infusions over 28.5 ± 14.9 weeks. Overall response rate was 89%, ranging among immunomodulators (subcutaneous methotrexate: 93%, oral methotrexate: 89%, mycophenolate mofetil: 100%, azathioprine: 50%). On average, eGFR increased during therapy (+ 10.3 ± 16.9 ml/min/1.73 m2), with CKD stability/improvement in 85%. Nineteen patients (56%) experienced gout flares. No infusion reactions or infections were noted. No new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings provide further support for increased pegloticase response rates when co-treatment with immunomodulating therapy is used.

Patients with gout that does not respond to oral urate-lowering therapies have heavy disease burden and few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate levels (SU) and resolves tophi, but anti-drug antibodies can limit urate-lowering efficacy duration. Evidence increasingly supports co-administering an immunomodulator with pegloticase to increase the proportion of patients with sustained urate-lowering response. However, there are few published cases from real-world clinical practice. This study examined treatment with pegloticase + immunomodulation at two community rheumatology practices. Patients who began treatment with pegloticase and an immunomodulator in 2017 or later were included. The proportion of patients with sustained urate-lowering response (≥ 12 infusions received, SU < 6 mg/dl at infusion 12) was investigated. Renal function before and after therapy was also examined. Thirty-four patients were included. Before treatment, SU averaged 9.1 mg/dl and most-reported comorbidities were hypertension (76%), obesity (71%), osteoarthritis (68%), and chronic kidney disease (47%). All patients began using an immunomodulator before or at first pegloticase infusion (subcutaneous methotrexate [20 patients], oral methotrexate [9 patients], mycophenolate mofetil [3 patients], and azathioprine [2 patients]). On average, 14.6 infusions were administered over 28.5 weeks and overall response rate was 89%. Response rate varied among different immunomodulators: subcutaneous methotrexate: 93%, oral methotrexate: 89%, mycophenolate mofetil: 100%, azathioprine: 50%. On average, kidney function improved, with chronic kidney disease stage stability/improvement in 85% of patients. Nineteen patients (56%) experienced gout flares. No infusion reactions or infections were noted and no new safety concerns were identified. These real-world findings provide further support for administering immunomodulation as co-therapy to pegloticase.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Model Simulations: Predicted Exposure and Efficacy for Maintenance Doses of Intravenous Golimumab Every 6 or 8 Weeks in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

PURPOSE: Golimumab is approved to treat moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis when given intravenously at weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) with concomitant methotrexate. These analyses assessed whether a shorter dosing interval could ameliorate diminished efficacy experienced by a small proportion of patients toward the end of the dosing interval. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response modeling simulations were performed for intravenous golimumab 2 mg/kg at weeks 0 and 4, then Q8W or every 6 weeks (Q6W) through 1 year. A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear clearance developed based on GO-FURTHER (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Golimumab, an Anti-TNFα Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Intravenously, in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy) study data was used for pharmacokinetic simulations. A latent-variable indirect exposure-response model developed based on GO-FURTHER American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%/50%/70% improvement (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) data was used to predict clinical endpoints of ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 response rates. FINDINGS: For Q6W and Q8W dosing, respectively, predicted median golimumab steady-state trough (Ctrough,ss) concentrations were 0.57 and 0.24 µg/mL, and Cmax at steady state values were 33.1 and 32.9 µg/mL. Predicted peak median ACR20 steady-state response rates were 76.7% (Q6W) and 75.6% (Q8W). Predicted median ACR20 response rates at Ctrough,ss increased by 4.7 percentage points with Q6W (73.7%) versus Q8W (69.0%) dosing. Greater improvement in ACR20 response rates at trough time points was predicted in patients with lower golimumab trough serum concentrations. Consistent findings were observed for ACR50/ACR70 response rates. IMPLICATIONS: These simulations suggest that intravenous golimumab Q6W dosing increases golimumab Ctrough,ss, which may improve clinical response in the small proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with waning efficacy at the end of the standard dosing interval. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT00973479. Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: EudraCT 2008-006064-11.

Denosumab Safety and Efficacy Among Participants in the FREEDOM Extension Study With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease.

CONTEXT: The effects of long-term exposure to denosumab in individuals with renal insufficiency are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of denosumab in individuals with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) (stages 2 and 3) using data from the pivotal phase 3, double-blind, 3-year FREEDOM (NCT00089791) and open-label, 7-year extension (NCT00523341) studies. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Women age 60 to 90 years with a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of less than -2.5 to greater than -4.0 at the total hip or lumbar spine were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months (long-term arm) or placebo (cross-over arm) in FREEDOM; eligible participants could enroll in the extension to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from study baseline and annualized rates of fracture and adverse events (AEs) were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Most participants (1259/1969 [64%] long-term arm; 1173/1781 [66%] crossover arm) with baseline CKD stage 2 or 3 remained within the same CKD subgroup at study completion; less than 3% progressed to CKD stage 4. Participants in all eGFR subgroups showed similar, persistent BMD gains over time and a low incidence of fractures. The percentage of participants reporting serious AEs was similar among renal subgroups (normal, CKD stage 2, CKD stage 3a, CKD stage 3b) both for the long-term (54% vs 52% vs 57% vs 58%) and crossover (43% vs 42% vs 43% vs 68%) arms, except CKD stage 3b subgroup, crossover arm. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of denosumab did not differ among participants with mild to moderate CKD.

The Effectiveness of Intravenous Golimumab Administered Directly After Infliximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

PURPOSE: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who do not respond or lose response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics, switching to a different anti-TNF can be an effective means to manage symptoms and disease progression. This study examined the utilization and effectiveness of intravenous golimumab within a real-world population of patients with RA switching directly from infliximab, a potent anti-TNF. METHODS: Patient charts (n = 113) were collected from five US-based rheumatology practices. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, infliximab and intravenous golimumab utilization data, and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), Physician Global Assessment (PhGA), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) scores were extracted from charts. The effectiveness of intravenous golimumab was assessed by comparing disease activity status pre- and post-initiation of intravenous golimumab therapy. FINDINGS: Significant decreases in patient disease activity were observed following treatment with intravenous golimumab. Mean CDAI and PhGA scores significantly decreased, and a significantly increased proportion of the population exhibited low disease activity or remission in the post intravenous golimumab period (p < 0.05). Limited changes were observed through the RAPID3 and PtGA. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study indicate that intravenous golimumab is effective in managing RA in a population of patients switching directly from infliximab (mean last dose 7.4 mg/kg).

Localized vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients with localized vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract (LVGT). METHODS: Medical records of 608 patients diagnosed with vasculitis involving the intra-abdominal vasculature and/or abdominal viscera between January 1996 and December 2007 were reviewed. Only patients with histopathological confirmation or typical angiographic findings of vasculitis localized to the abdomen were included. RESULTS: We identified 18 cases with LVGT over the 12-year study period. The patients were predominantly Caucasian (89%) and female (67%) with a median age at diagnosis of 53.5 (range 17.4-83.3) years. Most of the patients presented with abdominal pain and 12 (66.6%) patients presented with an acute abdomen requiring surgical intervention. At diagnosis, the median ESR was 30.5 (range 4-77) mm/h. Autoantibody screening was generally unrevealing. Abdominal CT scan findings included: bowel wall thickening, bowel infarction and solid organ infarcts. In 14 patients, the diagnosis of vasculitis was established by abdominal angiography. Histological evidence of vasculitis was recorded in 5 (28%) patients, most commonly from gall bladder or small intestine specimens. Corticosteroid therapy was administered to 10 (56%) patients, 5 of whom also received other immunosuppressive agents. Median duration of follow-up was 10.5 (range 2-156) months. No evidence of vasculitis outside the abdomen was observed during follow-up. Seven (39%) patients died during the follow-up period. Survival of the patient cohort (compared with an age-matched US white population) was significantly reduced (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LVGT is an uncommon form of vasculitis that can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.